Should I give my chapters a title? I’ve asked myself that question, and while there is no right or wrong answer, I prefer numbering the chapters. However, in a few of my novels, I opted to give chapters a title. I think there are pros and cons to that approach, and it depends on what I am writing. Titles can be grounding to me, as the writer; it gives me a parameter to adhere to as I write. For a reader, it might enhance anticipation, or arouse curiosity and the need to continue reading, however, it might also set expectation. The reader might expect something different.

Is the title a giveaway of the entire chapter? Not necessarily, a hint maybe, but I don’t think chapter titles should be written like a blog/article title, hence letting the reader know what the content is about. I think of it more like an invitation to continue reading, a mystery that unravels in the next few pages. In Moonlit Valley, I used chapter titles such as: Exile (for chapter 1), Boundaries, A New Truth … These titles don’t say much, however, they set the stage for what’s coming in the next few pages. In Ramblings of the Spirit (book 1 of The Dinorah Chronicles) I used a combination of chapter number followed by title. For example, Chapter 4 Dark Waters. I used the same format for the entire trilogy. However, when I wrote The Five-dollar Miracle, I numbered the chapters, only. For my current novel, The Girl Who Could Not Love, I prefer to use chapter numbers, although I could have used titles instead. For that particular novel, both formats seemed to fit well.

For me, the flow of the story dictates what I will do, but I find that the traditional numbered chapters work well always.